Forum

Wilf Hunter
@wilfhunter
Admin
Member
Joined: Nov 7, 2016
Last seen: Oct 1, 2026
Topics: 11 / Replies: 254
Much has been said in the last three pages (both helpful and unhelpful) so I won't be addressing a particular post anymore, but moving forward, these will be a few of the rules that we will set. The most important thing still is that we get what we came here for: movies with cheating/swinging wives and girlfriends.
 
1) Tinhorse has acknowledged to watch movies before he posts them. Thanks, man. Others should also do so. Hell, even just browsing the movie will do as long as you can confirm there are some cheating female/swinging scenes in there (but in relation to this, see #5 below).
 
2) This rule stays: New links can be posted for already known movies only if it satisfies two conditions:
 
a) The previous links posted for the said movies are dead and...
b) ..someone requests for them. If the requester fails to see the previous links (and those links are still working), please tell him nicely to search for it or you can give him the link to the post yourself (there's a "post link" icon on the upper right of each post and you can click it and get the link of that particular post).
 
Exception to this rule with its conditions are:
a) When the new link is a worthy upgrade (much better picture quality, or it has english subs where before it doesn't, etc). This pertains to older and rarer movies, I guess. New movies seldom need a quality upgrade but sometimes the previous link is a poor camcorder copy. Please don't abuse this exception.
 
b) The movie link is very new and you are still just a few posts away from it. Sort of an alternative link for the new movie. For example, I post an ok.ru post for a new movie, right? And a couple of posts right below mine, you also offer an alternative link, say a film1k.com link. I think this should be allowed.
 
3) Regarding advice/criticism. Each of us seem to be interpreting these two words differently, but okay, here goes: ADVICE or constructive criticism said in a nice way should be allowed. What's not allowed are the kind of CRITICISM that Poch does, very toxic and full of unnecessary name calling. ADVICE or constructive criticism will help improve the user experience in the forum. It does suck when you watch several movies posted here and find out that they don't have cheating/swinging females.
 
4) It is not necessary to provide descriptions of cheating scenes for a movie but it's welcome and much appreciated.
 
5) Movies with cheating/swinging females themes but with little to no eroticism (no sex scenes or kissing) are still allowed to be posted, as some people still do want them and they are still on topic. But it would be great to include a little description saying that a particular movie doesn't have erotic scenes in it or just kissing scenes only, or sex is just implied, etc. Also, movies with failed cheating situation can also be mentioned. Hell, I got a few of them in the site's database list. Sometimes they can be quite erotic, like a wife trying to cheat and failing, or a wife getting seduced but in the end resisted it completely. These movies are in a gray area but at least a discussion about them should be allowed, so that a user can decide for himself whether he will watch them or completely avoid them and not waste their time.
 
6) No fighting and unnecessary useless talks like in the last two pages. Let's just stick to posting and discovering movies with cheating/swinging females. I might start banning people if they continue fighting and calling each other names.
 
Thanks and let's move on. Happy wilfing to all of us.

I'm constantly learning and trying to find a common ground here that would be best for most.

@tinhorse I think we really need that rule so that we won't be repeating ourselves much. I mean, there are thousands of movies that are known to us already and if we keep posting links to those, and the majority of them nobody really wants anymore, then it could really fill up the thread fast. Now, in relation to that, I encourage people to be not shy in requesting for known movies that have dead links already, or links that are not accessible to them (but don't spam!) I think this will be more efficient because we will only be posting links for movies that have demand and that will cut down the number of possible posts.

@poch, I'm sorry buddy but so far, your contribution to the community is minuscule compared to tinhorse, even with his flaws. So why don't you just tell him nicely about your criticisms? Would it hurt you to do so? How about concentrate on contributing more useful stuff than breathing on his neck?

Oh also @tinhorse, is it true that some of the movies you post, you haven't actually seen and just relied on the IMDB cheating tags? If so, well that's one constructive criticism for you, buddy. But it's not like others are not doing it anyway. For example, someone posted Black Island (2021) here and said it's a super cheating movie. Sure it is, but there's only a cheating boyfriend in it as I found out.

I'm open to suggestions. Opening new threads are nice, but they usually don't get too many posts. But feel free to open one for a topic that you feel needs a separate thread, maintain it and see if it catches on.

As to the suggestion that movie posts should be accompanied by some description of the cheating scenes, I don't know.. should we set a rule on that, guys? Or should it still be up to the poster? Like, he can just post the bare minimum, an imdb link and a stream link, but as long as he's sure that there's definitely a cheating/swinging bitch on it, then it should be ok?


@tinhorse, thank you for your contributions as always, but please give updated links to known movies only when someone requests them and all the links are dead (I listed this rule before, but you seem to have missed it). If no one's requesting for a film that is already known to us, just let it be. This is so we can trim the length of our thread here which is very long already.

An exception I can think of is for relatively rare movies whose previous links were of poor quality, or the links before have no subs (for non-english movies) and the new link has it.

 

 


@filminist Yes this thread specifically is a cheating/swinging movies thread only. Please adhere to it. For non-cheating/swinging themed movies, post it at..

https://wilfmovies.com/community/main-forum/non-cheating-swinging-wife-discussion-and-requests/


Hey guys, when you reply to a post and the post is already a couple of pages back, please try to press "Quote" instead of "Reply" so that the original post will be included, that way we won't have trouble tracing the original post.


Posted by: @sherlock

Hi please One request to all group members And specially to @wilfhunter admin Sir please post this movie

Вмешательство

2020 starring Anna Chipovskaya

https://www.film.ru/movies/vmeshatelstvo-3

Wow Anna Chipovskaya. Sorry bro, can't find it too.

 


Posted by: @stealthwifelover

movie 4.8 stars .....if user clicks on it than it should mainly show:

movie 4.2 stars (25)

     WILF 5 stars (10)......meaning is hot

     Nudity 3 stars (8)

     Plot 4 stars (12)

     Print Quality 4 stars (20)

where (no. in brackets) suggests no. of people who have voted.

You know what, it seems that my rating star plugin can do this. I'll try to study it and see if I can put it up the way you suggested. Good one.


Posted by: @stealthwifelover

@Wilf Hunter @The Cuck @Sklegend @nevesjota @tinhorse Seriously we need separate thread for Online missing wilf/milf movies and/or subtitles....this way it would be easy for us to check plus visitors can post the unavailable content...to drive or mega.nz....  if they get their hands on it.

Feel free to start a thread on that topic and please maintain it. Go to the main channel below and find the 'Add Topic' button:

https://wilfmovies.com/community/main-forum/


@mistborn yes cheating is involved, the mother is still with the father. I don't know where to watch it tho.

https://wilfmovies.com/movies/dark-desire-2012/


Page / 27 First Last